César Javier Zurita Avila
cesarkarlakayla@hotmail.com
Unidad Educativa Simón Bolivar
Babahoyo, Ecuador
Karla Lorely Ayala Moreno
ayalamorenokarla@gmail.com
Unidad Educativa Simón Bolivar
Babahoyo, Ecuador
Martha Giomar Moreno palma
yomirita1970@hotmail.com
Unidad Educativa Simón Bolivar
Babahoyo, Ecuador
Strengthening Teachers’ Digital Competencies to Enhance Educational
Quality in Virtual Learning Environments
Fortalecimiento de competencias digitales docentes para mejorar la calidad
educativa en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
ISSN-L:3091-1893
10.63803
Gestión editorial
Fecha de recepción (Received): 30 de octubre de 2025.
Fecha de aceptación (Accepted): 19 de noviembre de 2025.
Fecha de publicación (Published online): 24 de noviembre de 2025.
Vol.1 Num.4- 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v1n4.34
Nayelly Nicole Garcés Cercado
garcesnicole621@gmail.com
Unidad Educativa Simón Bolivar
Babahoyo, Ecuador
Carlos Luis Ayala Moreno
carlosluisayalamoreno@gmail.com
Unidad Educativa Fluminense
Buena Fe, Ecuador
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
397
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
Strengthening Teachers’ Digital Competencies to Enhance Educational Quality in Virtual
Learning Environments
Fortalecimiento de competencias digitales docentes para mejorar la calidad educativa en entornos
virtuales de aprendizaje
Abstract
Keywords
The digital era has transformed educational paradigms, demanding teachers
to adapt their skills and methodologies to virtual learning environments.
This study explores the importance of strengthening teachers’ digital
competencies as a key factor in improving the quality of online education.
Grounded on the UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers
(2018) and the European Framework for the Digital Competence of
Educators (DigCompEdu), the research highlights the correlation between
teachers’ digital skills and students’ academic performance in online
contexts. Through a mixed-method approach, quantitative surveys and
qualitative interviews were conducted with teachers from secondary and
higher education institutions. Results revealed that teachers with higher
levels of digital competence demonstrate more effective use of digital
resources, stronger interaction with students, and better classroom
management in virtual platforms. Furthermore, institutional support and
continuous professional training emerged as critical elements in sustaining
educational quality. The study concludes that enhancing digital
competencies among teachers contributes to equity, innovation, and
pedagogical excellence in digital education.
• Digital Competence
• Teacher training
• Educational quality
• Virtual learning
• Innovation
Resumen
Palabras clave
La era digital ha transformado los paradigmas educativos, exigiendo que
los docentes adapten sus habilidades y metodologías a los entornos virtuales
de aprendizaje. Este estudio analiza la importancia de fortalecer las
competencias digitales docentes como un factor clave para mejorar la
calidad educativa en la educación en línea. Basado en el Marco de
Competencia en TIC para Docentes de la (UNESCO, 2018) y en el Marco
Europeo de Competencia Digital para Educadores (DigCompEdu), la
investigación evidencia la relación entre las habilidades digitales del
profesorado y el rendimiento académico del estudiante en contextos
virtuales. A través de un enfoque mixto, se aplicaron encuestas cuantitativas
y entrevistas cualitativas a docentes de instituciones de educación
secundaria y superior. Los resultados muestran que los docentes con
mayores niveles de competencia digital hacen un uso más eficaz de los
recursos tecnológicos, fortalecen la interacción con los estudiantes y
gestionan mejor sus clases en plataformas virtuales. Además, se destaca que
el apoyo institucional y la formación continua son elementos esenciales
para sostener la calidad educativa. Se concluye que el fortalecimiento de las
competencias digitales contribuye a la equidad, la innovación y la
excelencia pedagógica en la educación digital.
• Competencia digital
• Formación docente
• Calidad educativa
• Aprendizaje virtual
• Innovación
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
398
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
Introduction
The rapid development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has revolutionized
the educational landscape, reshaping how teachers design, deliver, and evaluate learning experiences.
Virtual learning environments (VLEs) have become essential spaces where students interact,
construct knowledge, and develop twenty-first-century skills. However, the effectiveness of these
environments largely depends on the teacher’s ability to integrate digital tools meaningfully into their
pedagogical practice. Strengthening teachers’ digital competencies, therefore, has become a central
element in achieving high-quality education.
According to (UNESCO, 2018) and (Redecker & Punie , 2017), digital competence encompasses not
only the technical use of technology but also the pedagogical, ethical, and communicative dimensions
that ensure inclusive and effective teaching. In this sense, the role of the teacher transitions from
being a transmitter of knowledge to a designer of interactive and student-centered digital experiences.
Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the urgent need for teachers to adapt to digital
platforms, revealing gaps in digital literacy and pedagogical innovation.
This article aims to analyze how enhancing teachers’ digital competencies can improve educational
quality in virtual learning environments. By examining training processes, institutional support, and
teaching practices, the study provides insights into the strategic development of digital education.
The focus is not only on technological proficiency but also on empowering teachers to innovate,
collaborate, and promote meaningful learning experiences in virtual contexts.
Methodology
1. Research Design
This study employed a mixed-methods research design, integrating both quantitative and qualitative
approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of how teachers’ digital competencies
influence educational quality in virtual learning environments. According to (Creswell & Plano Clark,
2017), mixed-methods research allows the combination of numerical data with interpretative insights,
enabling researchers to explore complex educational phenomena from multiple perspectives. The
quantitative phase focused on measuring the levels of digital competence among teachers, while the
qualitative phase aimed to interpret teachers’ perceptions and experiences in applying digital tools in
their pedagogical practices.
The research was structured in three main phases:
1. Diagnostic assessment of teachers’ digital competencies based on the European
Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu).
2. Survey administration to measure correlations between competence levels and
educational quality indicators.
3. Semi-structured interviews to obtain qualitative insights on institutional support,
challenges, and pedagogical innovation in digital environments.
This design was selected because it allows triangulation, which increases the reliability and validity
of findings (Denzin, 2017).
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
399
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
2. Participants and Sampling
The population consisted of teachers from secondary and higher education institutions across
Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru. A total of 120 participants were involved in the quantitative phase, and
15 teachers were purposively selected for the qualitative interviews. The participants were chosen
based on their active use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as Moodle, Google
Classroom, and Microsoft Teams during the academic year 2024–2025.
A stratified random sampling technique was used to ensure representation from both rural and urban
schools, and from different academic disciplines. According to (Etikan & Bala, 2017), this method
helps reduce sampling bias and ensures that diverse contexts are reflected in the data. Demographic
information revealed that 68% of the participants were female, 32% male, with an average teaching
experience of 10 years, and 85% held postgraduate degrees related to education or pedagogy.
3. Instruments
Three instruments were designed and validated to collect the data:
1. Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ) – adapted from the DigCompEdu Self-Assessment
Tool (Redecker & Punie , 2017), covering six dimensions:
• Professional engagement
• Digital resources
• Teaching and learning
• Assessment
• Empowering learners
• Facilitating learners’ digital competence
The instrument used a Likert scale (1–5) ranging from “very low competence” to “very high
competence.”
2. Educational Quality Perception Scale (EQPS) – created by the researcher based on the
(UNESCO, 2018)framework for quality education, including subdimensions of pedagogical
effectiveness, accessibility, student satisfaction, and innovation in teaching practices.
3. Semi-structured interview guide – consisted of 10 open-ended questions exploring teachers’
perceptions of digital training, institutional support, and challenges in online teaching.
The reliability of the quantitative instruments was verified through Cronbach’s Alpha, obtaining
values of 0.92 for the DCQ and 0.88 for the EQPS, indicating high internal consistency (Tavakol &
Dennick, 2011).
4. Data Collection Procedures
Data collection was carried out between March and June 2025. The questionnaire was distributed via
Google Forms, while the interviews were conducted through Zoom sessions recorded with
participants’ consent. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional research committee, and
participants signed an informed consent form guaranteeing confidentiality and voluntary
participation.
To ensure data validity, the research followed the ethical standards outlined by the American
Educational Research Association (AERA, 2011). Participation was anonymous, and responses were
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
400
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
coded numerically to maintain neutrality. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed
using NVivo 12 software for thematic categorization.
5. Data Analysis
Quantitative Analysis
Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics (means, frequencies,
and standard deviations) were used to summarize teachers’ digital competence levels. Inferential
analysis included Pearson correlation tests to examine the relationship between digital competence
and perceived educational quality.
Results indicated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) between teachers’ digital
competencies and the perceived quality of virtual education. Teachers who scored higher in digital
pedagogy and communication demonstrated higher levels of student engagement and learning
outcomes.
Qualitative Analysis
Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed through thematic coding. Following (Braun & Clarke,
2021) approach, the researcher identified key categories and subthemes, such as digital innovation,
pedagogical adaptation, institutional barriers, and emotional resilience in online teaching.
6. Analytical Categories
Category
Example of Evidence
Digital Pedagogical
Competence
“I create interactive lessons using
Google Forms and Jamboard.”
Institutional Support
“Our institution offers monthly
workshops on LMS management.”
Technological
Accessibility
“In rural areas, poor connectivity
limits my students’ access.”
Innovation and
Engagement
“Gamification increased students’
participation and retention.”
Continuous
Professional
Development
“I’m enrolled in an online MOOC to
improve my digital teaching.”
7. Validation and Triangulation
Triangulation was achieved by comparing data from the DCQ, EQPS, and interviews, ensuring that
both quantitative and qualitative findings supported each other. Peer debriefing was also conducted
with three educational researchers from the Technical University of Babahoyo, who reviewed coding
consistency and interpretive validity.
Following (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), the study established credibility, transferability, dependability,
and confirmability as criteria for qualitative rigor. The combined methodology strengthened the
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
401
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
reliability of the conclusions and provided a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship
between digital competence and educational quality.
8. Limitations
Despite its strengths, the study faced limitations related to sample size and self-reported data. The
findings cannot be generalized to all educational contexts due to institutional diversity. Additionally,
some teachers may have overestimated their digital proficiency. Future research should include
longitudinal studies and experimental designs to assess the long-term impact of digital competence
training on student learning outcomes.
9. Ethical Considerations
The research adhered to ethical standards of academic integrity, including informed consent,
confidentiality, and voluntary participation. Data storage followed the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) principles. Participants could withdraw at any stage without consequence,
ensuring autonomy and respect.
Results
1. Overview of Findings
The results of this study reveal a significant relationship between teachers’ digital competencies and
the perceived quality of virtual education. Quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrated that
higher levels of digital competence correspond to better instructional design, student interaction, and
innovation in online learning environments. Teachers who received continuous digital training or
participated in professional learning communities showed superior performance in using educational
technologies for pedagogical purposes.
Overall, 78% of teachers demonstrated intermediate to high levels of digital competence, while 22%
showed limited skills in technological integration and online assessment. This disparity suggests that,
although progress has been made since the COVID-19 pandemic, digital transformation remains
uneven across educational contexts.
According to (Redecker & Punie , 2017), the full development of digital competence requires teachers
to master both technical and pedagogical dimensions, integrating digital tools not only for content
delivery but also for collaboration, assessment, and feedback.
2. Quantitative Analysis
2.1. Descriptive Statistics
The quantitative results derived from the Digital Competence Questionnaire (DCQ) and the
Educational Quality Perception Scale (EQPS) show a clear pattern across the six DigCompEdu
dimensions.
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
402
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
Digital Competence Dimension
Mean
(M)
Standard Deviation
(SD)
Level of
Competence
Professional Engagement
4.2
0.61
High
Digital Resources
3.9
0.78
Medium–High
Teaching and Learning
4.1
0.69
High
Assessment Strategies
3.6
0.85
Medium
Empowering Learners
4.3
0.58
High
Facilitating Learners’
Competence
3.8
0.71
Medium–High
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for digital competence dimensions (N = 120).
The results indicate that teachers scored highest in Empowering Learners (M = 4.3) and Professional
Engagement (M = 4.2), which reflects their strong willingness to use digital tools to motivate and
support students. The lowest mean corresponded to Assessment Strategies (M = 3.6), suggesting that
teachers still struggle with online evaluation and feedback mechanisms.
This finding aligns with (UNESCO, 2018), which emphasizes that digital assessment remains one of
the least developed aspects of teacher competence worldwide due to limited training in the design of
digital rubrics and analytics.
2.2. Correlation Between Digital Competence and Educational Quality
The Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) confirms a strong positive association between
digital competence levels and perceived educational quality. Teachers with advanced digital skills
exhibited higher student engagement, improved communication, and better instructional adaptability
in virtual environments.
A linear regression model showed that digital competence accounted for 61% of the variance (R² =
0.61) in educational quality indicators. These results reinforce previous findings by (Cabero-
Almenara et al., 2021), who reported that teachers’ digital competence significantly predicts
innovation and effectiveness in online learning.
3. Qualitative Analysis
The thematic analysis of interviews provided deeper insights into teachers’ perceptions, challenges,
and best practices. The following themes emerged:
3.1. Theme 1 – Pedagogical Transformation
Teachers expressed that digital tools have transformed their teaching approaches, allowing them to
create interactive and student-centered experiences. For instance, one participant stated:
“Before, I was the center of the class; now, students create and collaborate. Tools like Padlet and
Canva made learning more participative.”
This reflects the transition from traditional instruction to constructivist pedagogy, supported by
(Siemens, 2014) connectivist learning theory, which views technology as a medium for knowledge
co-construction.
3.2. Theme 2 – Institutional Support and Continuous Training
A recurring theme was the importance of institutional support. Teachers highlighted that schools and
universities offering digital training programs achieved better teaching results. Those without
institutional backing struggled to integrate technology effectively.
“Our university organized workshops on gamification and artificial intelligence in education, and I
immediately noticed improved student motivation.”
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
403
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
This finding aligns with (Koehler & Mishra, 2009) TPACK model, emphasizing the intersection of
technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge as essential for quality digital instruction.
3.3. Theme 3 – Barriers and Challenges
Despite positive results, teachers identified multiple barriers such as limited connectivity, lack of
technical assistance, and digital fatigue. Rural educators faced more severe challenges, noting that
internet instability restricted synchronous teaching. These obstacles echo the concerns of (Bozkurt &
Sharma, 2021), who observed that global inequalities in digital access continue to hinder the
sustainability of online education.
3.4. Theme 4 – Innovation and Engagement
Several participants highlighted the potential of digital tools to enhance engagement and creativity.
Teachers integrating gamification and multimedia resources (e.g., Kahoot, Genially, and Canva)
reported greater student motivation. This supports the argument of (Huang et al., 2020) that
interactive tools positively influence learner attention and cognitive engagement in virtual
environments.
4. Comparative Analysis by Educational Level
Differences were found between secondary and higher education teachers. University teachers
showed higher digital competence (M = 4.4) compared to secondary teachers (M = 3.7), mainly due
to more frequent access to technological resources and institutional training. However, secondary
teachers displayed greater creativity in using free and open-access tools, compensating for resource
limitations. This result confirms the claim of (European Commission, 2022) that teacher development
must be context-sensitive, supporting digital equity between different educational levels.
5. Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Results
The integration of findings revealed that teachers’ professional engagement and innovation were the
strongest predictors of educational quality. Conversely, assessment strategies and technological
infrastructure emerged as the weakest factors.
Figure 1. Teachers’ Digital Competence Levels
Figure 1. Teachers’ Digital Competence Levels
22%
46%
32%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Low Intermediate High
Percentage
Teachers’ Digital Competence Levels
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
404
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
6. Interpretation of the Graph
The bar chart above (Figure 1) illustrates the distribution of teachers according to their overall digital
competence levels: 22% low, 46% intermediate, and 32% high. These results show that most
teachers remain in the intermediate range, indicating partial mastery of digital tools but limited
pedagogical integration. The relatively low percentage of highly competent teachers suggests that
sustained professional development is still needed.
Comparatively, the results align with the (European Commission, 2022)findings that most European
educators also fall within intermediate levels of digital competence, confirming that the challenge is
global rather than regional.
7. Qualitative–Quantitative Synthesis
When cross-analyzing both data sets, a clear pattern emerges:
• Teachers with high digital competence designed richer learning experiences, used data
analytics to personalize instruction, and fostered inclusive online participation.
• Those with intermediate competence managed basic communication and resource sharing
but struggled with student feedback automation and virtual assessments.
• Teachers with low competence mainly used digital tools as repositories, without
interactive strategies or monitoring mechanisms.
These findings reinforce the conceptual model proposed by (Redecker & Punie , 2017), where
progression in digital competence translates directly into improved educational outcomes and
innovation capacity.
8. Impact on Educational Quality
From the EQPS results, 82% of teachers agreed that developing digital competence significantly
improves their instructional effectiveness, motivation, and classroom management. Qualitative
evidence also indicated higher student satisfaction and participation when teachers used blended or
gamified approaches.
For instance, a teacher shared:
“After I began using digital storytelling and real-time quizzes, my students’ participation doubled.
They now connect learning to their daily experiences.”
This observation aligns with (Huang et al., 2020), who found that integrating digital storytelling and
gamified activities enhances learner engagement and cognitive retention.
9. Cross-Institutional Comparison
Comparative results among the three participating countries (Ecuador, Colombia, Peru) revealed
similar patterns, though with slight variations:
Country
Mean Competence
Level
Main Strength
Primary Challenge
Ecuador
3.9
Use of open-source LMS
platforms
Connectivity and time
constraints
Colombia
4.1
Digital collaboration and
teamwork
Assessment feedback
Peru
3.7
Creativity and use of multimedia
Institutional training access
Table 2. Comparative analysis by country (N = 120).
The overall trend shows that Latin American educators are progressing in digital literacy but still need
structured institutional frameworks to sustain quality in online education.
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
405
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
10. Statistical Summary
A multiple regression analysis confirmed that professional engagement (β = 0.41) and innovation in
teaching (β = 0.36) were the strongest predictors of educational quality. Assessment competence
showed a lower but still significant effect (β = 0.18, p < 0.05). These statistics demonstrate that digital
engagement and creative pedagogies are the driving forces behind quality improvements in online
education.
11. Summary of Key Findings
Indicator
Result
Interpretation
Pearson Correlation (r)
0.78 (p < 0.01)
Strong positive correlation between digital
competence and educational quality.
Regression (R²)
0.61
61% of educational quality explained by digital
competence variables.
Highest Mean
Dimension
Empowering Learners
(M = 4.3)
Teachers successfully use technology to motivate
and support learners.
Lowest Mean
Dimension
Assessment Strategies
(M = 3.6)
Digital evaluation practices need improvement.
Teachers with High
Competence
32%
Reflects emerging digital maturity but still below
optimal level.
Table 3. Statistical summary of main quantitative results.
12. Interpretation
The integration of data from all instruments demonstrates that digital pedagogy and continuous
training are the foundations of educational quality in virtual settings. Teachers who combined
technological mastery with student-centered methodologies achieved the best learning outcomes.
As (Cabeza-Rodríguez , 2025) argues, quality digital education emerges not from technology itself
but from pedagogically sound practices supported by institutional vision.
Thus, the evidence confirms that investing in teachers’ digital competence is an effective strategy for
improving educational quality, fostering innovation, and ensuring inclusive learning opportunities in
the digital age.
Discussion
The findings of this study provide robust evidence that teachers’ digital competencies play a decisive
role in shaping the quality of virtual education. The discussion that follows interprets these results in
the light of international frameworks, previous research, and theoretical perspectives.
1. Digital Competence as a Predictor of Educational Quality
The strong correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) found between teachers’ digital competencies and
educational quality confirms that digital proficiency is a core determinant of pedagogical
effectiveness in online contexts. This aligns with the results of (Cabero-Almenara et al., 2021), who
found that teachers with higher digital literacy design more interactive and innovative learning
environments. Similarly, (UNESCO, 2018) emphasizes that digital competence is not merely
technical; it involves pedagogical and ethical dimensions that promote inclusive, equitable, and high-
quality education.
The data showed that teachers excelled in Empowering Learners and Professional Engagement,
indicating an ability to use technology to motivate students and foster participation. However,
weaknesses in Assessment Strategies reveal a gap in teachers’ ability to implement reliable and
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
406
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
creative digital evaluation methods. These findings are consistent with (Cabero-Almenara et al.,
2023), who reported that assessment remains the least developed component of digital competence
in Latin American contexts.
2. Pedagogical Innovation and Student Engagement
Qualitative evidence highlights that the integration of digital tools such as Kahoot, Padlet, and
Genially fostered creativity, collaboration, and learner autonomy. Teachers’ testimonies confirm that
these tools transformed the classroom dynamic, moving from teacher-centered instruction to student-
centered digital learning. This finding aligns with the connectivist learning theory proposed by
(Siemens, 2014), which views technology as a facilitator for constructing and sharing knowledge
collaboratively.
Moreover, gamification and multimedia tools were reported to enhance student motivation and
cognitive engagement, a pattern supported by (Huang et al., 2020), who demonstrated that interactive
technologies improve attention and participation in virtual learning environments. The use of these
strategies suggests a shift toward more constructivist pedagogies, where students become active
participants in the learning process rather than passive recipients.
3. Institutional Support and Professional Development
One of the most significant findings concerns the role of institutional support and continuous training
in developing digital competence. Teachers who worked in institutions that offered structured digital
programs exhibited higher confidence and skill levels in the use of learning management systems and
digital assessment tools.
This finding resonates with the TPACK model (Koehler & Mishra, 2009), which argues that effective
digital teaching emerges from the intersection of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge.
Without institutional training or leadership, teachers tend to rely on basic technological applications
without integrating them into meaningful pedagogical frameworks.
Additionally, the results echo the (European Commission, 2022), which stresses that sustainable
digital education requires not only infrastructure but also leadership commitment, mentoring, and
peer collaboration. Thus, the creation of communities of practice and ongoing professional learning
opportunities are essential for ensuring long-term improvement in digital competence.
4. Barriers and Inequalities in Digital Education
The disparities identified between rural and urban educators—particularly concerning internet
connectivity and access to resources—highlight a critical challenge for equitable digital
transformation. Teachers in rural contexts reported that unstable connections and limited access to
institutional support hindered their ability to conduct synchronous sessions effectively.
These barriers mirror the concerns of (Bozkurt & Sharma, 2021), who argued that technological
inequality remains one of the most significant obstacles to inclusive online education globally.
Consequently, policymakers must prioritize digital infrastructure development and ensure equitable
access to both devices and connectivity.
Moreover (Cabeza-Rodríguez , 2025) emphasizes that quality digital education does not depend
solely on the availability of technology, but on context-sensitive pedagogical models that adapt to
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
407
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
local realities. Therefore, addressing the digital divide requires coordinated efforts that combine
investment in infrastructure with teacher empowerment and localized innovation.
5. Comparative and Regional Insights
The comparison across Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru reveals similar trends in the development of
digital competence, suggesting a regional pattern where digital transformation is progressing but
remains fragmented. The slightly higher mean scores in Colombia (M = 4.1) may be attributed to
greater institutional investment in teacher training and digital platforms. However, Peruvian and
Ecuadorian teachers demonstrated creative adaptability, often relying on open-access tools and self-
training initiatives.
These regional differences reinforce the idea proposed by (Redecker & Punie , 2017) that digital
competence frameworks must be flexible and adaptable to different educational systems and
sociocultural contexts. A one-size-fits-all approach to digital training is insufficient; rather, strategies
must reflect the specific needs and realities of local institutions.
6. Implications for Policy and Practice
The results of this study carry important implications for educational leaders and policymakers. First,
digital competence should be integrated into national teacher training standards as a core professional
requirement. Second, institutions should adopt comprehensive frameworks such as DigCompEdu
(Redecker & Punie , 2017) or the UNESCO ICT-CFT (2018) to guide teachers’ digital development
systematically.
Additionally, the creation of institutional digital literacy certification programs could formalize and
validate teachers’ progress in this domain. Continuous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms should
be implemented to assess how training programs impact teaching quality and student learning
outcomes.
Furthermore, schools and universities must promote a culture of innovation and collaboration, where
educators share best practices, experiment with new tools, and reflect critically on their digital
pedagogy. The adoption of digital peer mentoring systems can help teachers support each other,
fostering a sustainable cycle of professional growth.
7. Theoretical Integration and Future Perspectives
From a theoretical standpoint, the study confirms the interaction between competence frameworks
(e.g., DigCompEdu), pedagogical models (e.g., TPACK), and learning theories (e.g., connectivism)
as complementary dimensions that shape teachers’ digital performance. Future research could explore
how artificial intelligence and adaptive learning systems might further personalize digital education
and teacher development.
Longitudinal studies are also recommended to measure the long-term impact of digital competence
training on learning outcomes, motivation, and educational equity.
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
408
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
8. Synthesis
In summary, the discussion consolidates the idea that strengthening teachers’ digital competencies
directly enhances educational quality in virtual environments. Beyond mastering technology, teachers
must cultivate critical, ethical, and creative dimensions of digital pedagogy. As (UNESCO, 2018) and
(Cabeza-Rodríguez , 2025) emphasize, digital competence is not only about using tools but about
transforming education into a more inclusive, participatory, and meaningful experience for all
learners.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated that teachers’ digital competencies are a fundamental pillar in
achieving educational quality in virtual learning environments. The results highlight that educators
who master digital tools and integrate them pedagogically create richer, more inclusive, and
motivating learning experiences. The strong positive correlation between digital competence and
perceived educational quality supports the argument that technological literacy, combined with
pedagogical innovation, drives effective virtual education (Cabero-Almenara et al., 2021);
(UNESCO, 2018).
Teachers who scored higher in professional engagement and learner empowerment displayed greater
confidence and creativity in designing interactive and collaborative lessons. However, deficiencies in
assessment strategies emphasize the urgent need to strengthen teachers’ abilities in online evaluation,
data analytics, and digital feedback processes (Cabero-Almenara et al., 2023). Addressing these
weaknesses through systematic and continuous professional development is essential to ensure the
sustainability of digital transformation in education.
Institutional support emerged as a determining factor in enhancing digital competence. Schools and
universities that implemented structured training programs, mentoring systems, and digital literacy
workshops achieved higher teaching performance and innovation levels. These findings confirm the
TPACK model (Koehler & Mishra, 2009), which posits that true technological integration occurs
when teachers combine technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge coherently.
Moreover, the study underscores persistent inequalities in digital access, particularly in rural and low-
income areas. As (Bozkurt & Sharma, 2021) note, technological disparities must be addressed
through public policies that guarantee equitable access to devices, connectivity, and institutional
training. Quality virtual education will remain incomplete until these structural barriers are mitigated.
In conclusion, strengthening teachers’ digital competencies is not only a response to technological
change but also a pedagogical and ethical commitment to the future of education. Educational
institutions must adopt comprehensive frameworks like DigCompEdu (Redecker & Punie , 2017) to
guide teachers’ professional growth, supported by ongoing evaluation and innovation. The findings
reaffirm that digital competence is inseparable from educational quality, and investing in teachers’
continuous development is the most effective strategy to ensure inclusive, equitable, and
transformative virtual learning in the 21st century.
References
AERA. (2011). American Educational Research Association. Code of ethics. AERA.:
https://www.aera.net/about-aera/aera-rules-policies/professional-ethics
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus
pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
www.prismajournal.org
ISSN-L: 3091– 1893
DOI: 10.63803
409
Prisma Journal 2025 | Vol. 1 – Núm. 4 | ISSN: 3091-1893 | pp 397–409 | Licencia CC BY 4.0
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.
https://books.google.com.ec/books/about/Thematic_Analysis.html?id=mToqEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc
=y
Cabero-Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F., Ruiz-Palmero , J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Digital
competence of higher education professor according to DigCompEdu. Statistical research methods
with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges. Educ Inf Technol , 26, 4691–
4708. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5
Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J.-J., Barroso-Osuna, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez , A. (2023). Digital
Teaching Competence According to the DigCompEdu Framework. Comparative Study in Different
Latin American Universities. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 276-291.
Cabeza-Rodríguez , M.-Á. (2025). Asistentes ChatGPT en educación superior en línea y satisfacción del
alumnado: un caso de estudio. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(2), 9-38.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43552
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE
Publications.
Denzin, N. (2017). A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Routledge.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International
Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
European Commission. (2022). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027. Publications Office of the EU:
https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/plan
Huang, R., Liu, D., Tlili, A., Yang, J., & Wang, H. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during
educational disruption. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.
https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Handbook-on-Facilitating-Flexible-Learning-in-
COVID-19-Outbreak-SLIBNU-V1.2-20200315.pdf
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Redecker , C., & Punie , Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators:
DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770
Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of
Instructional Technology & Distance Learning.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical
Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO's ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. (Version 3). Paris: UNESCO:
https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-competencies-skills/ict-cft