Sara Muhammad Salama Muhammad

totykhalid22@gmail.com

Alson High Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Accountability in the Egyptian Education System:

Challenges and Perspectives

La Rendición de Cuentas en el Sistema Educativo de

Egipto: Retos y Perspectivas

ISSN-L:3091-1893

10.63803

Gestión editorial

Fecha de recepción (Received): 24 de abril de 2025.

Fecha de aceptación (Accepted): 10 de mayo de 2025.

Fecha de publicación (Published online): 17 de mayo de 2025.

Vol.1 Num.2 - 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v1n2.07

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

66

Abstract

Resumen

Keywords

• Accountability

• Education

• Egypt

• Educational Policy

• Quality Assurance

Palabras clave

• Rendición de cuentas

• Educación

• Egipto

• Política educativa

• Aseguramiento de la calidad

Accountability in education is a pivotal element for ensuring quality,

transparency, and continuous improvement. In Egypt, the concept of

accountability has gained increasing relevance amid national efforts to

reform the education sector. This article analyzes the current state of

educational accountability in Egypt, examining both its policy frameworks

and practical challenges. Through qualitative document analysis and expert

interviews, the study identifies key barriers such as bureaucratic

inefficiencies, lack of data-driven decision-making, and limited

stakeholder participation. The findings suggest that accountability

mechanisms in Egypt are often perceived as top-down control instruments

rather than tools for professional development and collaborative

improvement. The article advocates for redefining accountability as a

shared responsibility that fosters institutional growth, professional

capacity-building, and community engagement. It concludes with

recommendations to enhance data systems, promote inclusive governance,

and align accountability practices with educational quality objectives.

La rendición de cuentas en la educación es un elemento fundamental para

garantizar la calidad, la transparencia y la mejora continua. En Egipto, el

concepto de rendición de cuentas ha cobrado relevancia en el contexto de

las reformas educativas emprendidas a nivel nacional. Este artículo

analiza el estado actual de la rendición de cuentas en el sistema educativo

egipcio, abordando sus marcos normativos y desafíos prácticos. A través

de un análisis cualitativo de documentos oficiales y entrevistas con

expertos, se identifican barreras clave como la ineficiencia burocrática, la

falta de toma de decisiones basada en datos y la escasa participación de

los actores sociales. Los resultados muestran que los mecanismos de

rendición de cuentas en Egipto son percibidos, en su mayoría, como

instrumentos de control jerárquico más que como herramientas para el

desarrollo profesional y la mejora colaborativa. El artículo propone

redefinir la rendición de cuentas como una responsabilidad compartida,

que promueva el fortalecimiento institucional, el desarrollo de

capacidades y la participación comunitaria. Se concluye con

recomendaciones para mejorar los sistemas de datos, fomentar la

gobernanza inclusiva y alinear las prácticas de rendición de cuentas con

los objetivos de calidad educativa.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

67

Introduction

Accountability has become a central theme in global education reform, representing a vital

mechanism to ensure that educational systems deliver equitable and high-quality learning outcomes.

In Egypt, the pursuit of accountability is deeply intertwined with broader efforts to modernize the

educational sector, enhance governance, and respond to socio-economic challenges (World Bank,

2018).

The Egyptian Ministry of Education has introduced multiple reforms, such as the Education 2.0

Strategy, aiming to shift towards competency-based learning and improve institutional accountability

(MoE, 2018). However, the translation of these policies into effective practices remains problematic.

Studies reveal persistent obstacles, including bureaucratic inertia, insufficient monitoring systems,

and limited engagement of key stakeholders like teachers, parents, and local communities,

(UNESCO, 2021)

This article explores how accountability is conceptualized and implemented within the Egyptian

education system. It seeks to understand the disconnect between policy intentions and actual

practices, identifying systemic barriers and proposing actionable strategies for improvement. By

analyzing official documents and collecting insights from education experts, the study aims to

contribute to the ongoing discourse on educational accountability in Egypt, offering evidence-based

recommendations to enhance its role in achieving quality education.

Methodology

Research Design

This study employs a qualitative exploratory research design to investigate the implementation and

challenges of accountability mechanisms in the Egyptian education system. Given the complexity of

accountability—encompassing policy, institutional, and cultural dimensions—a qualitative approach

allows for a deeper understanding of contextual realities (Creswell & Poth, 2018). The research is

interpretivist in nature, focusing on the subjective perceptions of key stakeholders and policy

documentation to derive insights.

Data Collection Methods

Data were collected through two primary sources:

1. Document Analysis

2. Semi-structured Expert Interviews

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

68

Document Analysis

An in-depth analysis of official policy documents, reports, and strategic plans was conducted. Key

sources included:

• Egypt’s Education 2.0 Strategy (MoE, 2018),

• National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Education (NAQAAE,

2021) Annual Reports (2020-2022)

• Relevant reports from (UNESCO, 2021), (World Bank, 2018), and (OECD, 2013) related

to Egypt's educational governance

Document analysis followed the (Bowen , 2009) model, focusing on identifying themes related to:

• Accountability frameworks

• Evaluation and monitoring processes

• Policy-practice gaps

Expert Interviews

To complement document analysis, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 key

informants:

• 3 officials from the Egyptian Ministry of Education (MoE, 2018).

• 2 experts from (NAQAAE, 2021)

• 3 school principals (primary and secondary levels)

• 2 academic researchers specializing in educational policy

Interview questions explored:

• Definitions and perceptions of accountability

• Experiences with policy implementation

• Challenges and barriers in practice

• Suggestions for improvement

Interviews were conducted between January and March 2025, lasting 45–60 minutes each, and

recorded with consent.

Sampling Strategy

A purposive sampling technique was employed, ensuring that participants had direct involvement or

expertise in educational accountability. The selection criteria included:

• Minimum of 5 years of experience in educational governance or school leadership

• Direct involvement in implementing or evaluating accountability measures

• Academic research experience in Egyptian education policy

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

69

This approach aligns with (Patton, 2015) emphasis on selecting "information-rich cases" for

qualitative inquiry.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, following (Braun & Clarke, 2006) six-phase framework:

1. Familiarization with data

2. Generating initial codes

3. Searching for themes

4. Reviewing themes

5. Defining and naming themes

6. Producing the report

Interview transcripts were coded manually, with recurrent patterns categorized under three main

themes:

• Policy-Practice Discrepancy

• Institutional and Cultural Barriers

• Recommendations for Effective Accountability

For document analysis, a content matrix was used to map policy objectives against practical

challenges identified in the field.

Ethical Considerations

The study adhered to ethical research standards:

• Informed consent was obtained from all interview participants.

• Anonymity was ensured through coding (e.g., P1 for Principal 1, E1 for Expert 1).

• Ethical approval was secured from the Faculty of Education, Cairo University (Approval

Code: EDU2025/006).

Trustworthiness and Rigor

To ensure credibility, several strategies were implemented:

• Triangulation: Combining document analysis with expert interviews enhanced data

reliability (Denzin, 2012).

• Member checking: Summaries of interviews were sent to participants for validation.

• Peer debriefing: Findings were discussed with two external researchers for critical feedback.

• Audit trail: Detailed documentation of the research process was maintained.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

70

Limitations

The study acknowledges limitations inherent to qualitative research:

• The sample size (10 experts) limits generalizability.

• Potential response bias from officials aware of policy shortcomings.

• The study focuses on general education, not including technical or higher education sectors.

Despite these limitations, the findings offer valuable insights into systemic accountability challenges

within Egypt’s primary and secondary education levels.

Table 1: Overview of Data Sources and Analysis Methods

Data Source

Participants/Documents

Analysis

Method

Purpose

Official Policy

Documents

Education 2.0 Strategy,

(NAQAAE, 2021)Reports,

(UNESCO, 2021), World Bank,

(OECD, 2013)publications

Content

Analysis

(Bowen , 2009)

Identify

accountability

frameworks, policy-

practice gaps, and

evaluation methods

Semi-Structured

Interviews

10 Key Informants ( (MoE,

2018)Officials, (NAQAAE,

2021)Experts, School Principals,

Researchers)

Thematic

Analysis (Braun

& Clarke, 2006)

Explore perceptions,

challenges, and

improvement

strategies related to

accountability

Triangulation of

Documents &

Interviews

Combined insights from both

sources

Comparative

Thematic

Synthesis

Cross-validate

findings and ensure

reliability of results

Results

The analysis of policy documents and interviews with experts provided a comprehensive

understanding of how accountability is framed, perceived, and practiced within the Egyptian

education system. Findings are organized into three main categories:

1. Policy Frameworks and Intended Accountability Mechanisms

2. Practical Implementation Challenges

3. Stakeholder Perceptions and Improvement Needs

Policy Frameworks and Intended Accountability Mechanisms

The Egyptian Ministry of Education has developed various frameworks aimed at enhancing

accountability, primarily through its flagship Education 2.0 Strategy (MoE, 2018) and the work of

the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Education (NAQAAE,

2021).

Key policies emphasize:

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

71

• Teacher performance evaluations

• School self-assessment reports

• Standardized national student assessments

• External quality audits conducted by (NAQAAE, 2021).

•

However, document analysis revealed that accountability is largely designed as a compliance-driven

system, with a focus on reporting and inspection rather than continuous professional development or

institutional improvement.

Table 2: Accountability Components in Egypt’s Education Policies

Policy Instrument

Objective

Responsible Entity

Teacher Performance

Evaluation Framework

Monitor teacher effectiveness

Ministry of Education

National Student

Assessments

Measure learning outcomes at

various education levels

National Center for

Examinations

School Self-Assessment (SSA)

Encourage internal quality

monitoring

School Management &

(NAQAAE, 2021)

External Quality Audits

Ensure compliance with

accreditation standards

(NAQAAE, 2021)

(Adapted from (MoE, 2018); (NAQAAE, 2021))

While these frameworks exist on paper, their operationalization remains inconsistent across regions

and school types (urban vs rural).

Practical Implementation Challenges

Interviews with (MoE, 2018) officials, (NAQAAE, 2021) experts, and school principals highlighted

several implementation barriers that limit the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms:

Bureaucratic Inertia and Centralization

Participants consistently pointed out that top-down governance structures hinder school-level

autonomy. Decisions regarding teacher evaluations, resource allocation, and performance

improvements are centralized, limiting schools’ ability to respond to local needs.

“We have to wait for ministry approvals for minor adjustments. This slows down any meaningful

accountability practice at the school level.” (Principal 1)

Weak Data Systems

A recurring theme was the lack of robust data infrastructure. School performance data are often

outdated or incomplete, affecting decision-making at all levels.

“Without accurate data, accountability becomes a formality rather than a functional process.” (

(NAQAAE, 2021) Expert 2)

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

72

Teacher Resistance and Professional Development Gaps

Teachers view accountability as punitive rather than developmental, leading to resistance. Many

teachers reported receiving little to no professional development linked to evaluation results.

“Teachers feel targeted by evaluations but are not given support to improve. This creates a culture

of fear, not growth.” (MoE, 2018) Official 3.

Limited Stakeholder Engagement

Both principals and policymakers acknowledged the minimal involvement of parents and

communities in accountability processes. Existing structures for parental involvement are often

symbolic.

“We need more active school boards that include parents, but currently, it’s mostly top-down

reporting.” (Principal 3)

Stakeholder Perceptions and Improvement Needs

Despite challenges, stakeholders expressed clear ideas about how accountability could be improved.

Redefining Accountability as Collaborative

Most interviewees advocated for shifting accountability from a control mechanism to a collaborative

tool aimed at supporting teachers and schools.

“Accountability should be about improvement, not punishment. We need a cultural shift.”

(Researcher 2)

Capacity Building and Professional Development

There was unanimous agreement on the need for ongoing teacher training linked to accountability

outcomes. Current sporadic workshops are insufficient.

Enhancing Data-Driven Decision-Making

Investment in modern data systems and school management information systems (SMIS) was cited

as crucial for transparency and informed accountability.

Inclusive Governance Models

Stakeholders emphasized that parental and community involvement is essential for meaningful

accountability. Proposals included revitalizing parent-teacher associations (PTAs) and implementing

participatory school governance models.

Summary of Findings

The results indicate a disconnect between policy design and implementation. While Egypt has

comprehensive accountability frameworks, systemic barriers like centralization, weak data systems,

and insufficient stakeholder engagement hinder effective practice.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

73

Figure 1: Accountability Practice Gap in Egypt’s Education System

↓

Regional Disparities

An important finding was the variation in accountability practices between urban and rural

schools. Rural schools face additional challenges due to resource constraints and limited supervisory

capacity.

“In rural areas, inspections are infrequent, and accountability is mostly paperwork. There’s little

follow-up.” (MoE, 2018) Official 2.

Comparative Insight

When compared with other middle-income countries, Egypt’s accountability challenges reflect

broader governance issues typical in centralized systems ( (World Bank, 2018). However, successful

models in Tunisia and Morocco show that decentralization and community involvement can

significantly enhance accountability outcomes (UNESCO, 2021).

Discussion

This study examined the state of accountability within Egypt’s education system, revealing significant

discrepancies between policy intentions and practical implementation. While Egypt has developed

comprehensive accountability frameworks inspired by global standards, the real-world application of

these policies faces systemic obstacles. This section discusses the implications of these findings and

proposes pathways for improvement.

Policy Intentions

(Top-down Compliance Focus)

• Bureaucratic Inertia

• Weak Data Systems

• Teacher Resistance

• Low Stakeholder Engagement

Limited Impact on Education Quality

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

74

Compliance-Driven Accountability: A Cultural and Structural Barrier

One of the central findings is that accountability in Egypt remains predominantly compliance-driven,

reflecting a legacy of centralized governance. Policies such as the Education 2.0 Strategy (MoE,

2018) and the (NAQAAE, 2021)quality assurance frameworks emphasize inspections, reports, and

formal evaluations. However, these are often implemented in a top-down manner, where schools are

expected to comply with directives rather than engage in genuine quality improvement.

This approach resonates with broader global critiques of centralized education systems, where

accountability is viewed more as bureaucratic control than a mechanism for enhancing teaching and

learning (OECD, 2013). In Egypt’s case, such control inhibits innovation at the school level,

discourages professional autonomy, and fosters a culture of compliance rather than responsibility.

Key Challenges Undermining Effective Accountability

The research identified four main challenges limiting the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms

in Egypt:

1. Overcentralization and Bureaucratic Inertia

School leaders reported limited decision-making power, making it difficult to address

performance issues promptly. This reflects a rigid administrative structure where local actors

are excluded from meaningful participation (El-Amine, 2020).

2. Weak Data Systems

Accurate, real-time data is essential for informed accountability. However, Egypt’s current

data infrastructure is fragmented and outdated, leading to superficial reporting rather than

evidence-based interventions (NAQAAE, 2021).

3. Teacher Resistance and Limited Professional Support

Teachers often perceive evaluations as punitive rather than developmental. This is

exacerbated by the lack of linked professional development programs, creating a culture of

fear and resistance rather than one of growth (Ibrahim Ramadan et al., 2011).

4. Exclusion of Key Stakeholders

Parents, students, and community members have minimal involvement in school governance

and accountability processes. Effective accountability requires shared ownership, yet

Egypt’s current model remains largely hierarchical (UNESCO, 2021).

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

75

Accountability and Regional Inequities

A critical dimension of the findings is the disparity between urban and rural schools. Rural schools

face more severe challenges, including limited resources, infrequent supervision, and weaker

institutional capacity. These factors contribute to a widening gap in educational quality and highlight

the importance of context-sensitive accountability strategies.

Addressing these disparities requires differentiated approaches that consider local needs, moving

away from a one-size-fits-all model. This is in line with global best practices, where decentralized

accountability systems have proven effective in promoting equity (World Bank, 2018).

International Experiences: Lessons for Egypt

Other Middle Eastern and North African countries, such as Tunisia and Morocco, have initiated

reforms to decentralize accountability and involve local communities in school governance. These

experiences demonstrate that shifting from central control to participatory accountability can enhance

educational outcomes (UNESCO, 2021).

For Egypt, adopting similar reforms would involve:

• Delegating more authority to school management.

• Strengthening community-school partnerships.

• Encouraging local innovation within accountability frameworks.

Towards a Developmental Approach to Accountability

The global trend is moving towards accountability systems that balance oversight with support.

Successful models integrate evaluation with feedback, coaching, and professional development,

fostering a culture of continuous improvement (OECD, 2013).

Egypt’s current accountability approach must evolve from compliance-based control to

developmental accountability by:

• Linking evaluation results with targeted professional development.

• Encouraging collaborative reflection among teachers and school leaders.

• Creating incentive structures that reward innovation and quality improvement.

Such a shift would not only improve teaching practices but also increase teacher motivation and

engagement.

Data-Driven Decision-Making and Technological Integration

Another critical factor is the need to modernize Egypt’s School Management Information Systems

(SMIS). Reliable data is essential for monitoring performance, identifying gaps, and guiding

interventions. Investment in digital infrastructure would enhance transparency, support evidence-

based accountability, and empower schools to take ownership of their performance (World Bank,

2018).

Incorporating real-time data analytics can transform accountability from a retrospective audit process

into a dynamic, proactive tool for improvement.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

76

The Role of Inclusive Governance

Finally, fostering inclusive governance models is essential. Accountability cannot be effective if it

remains confined to hierarchical structures. Engaging parents, students, and community

representatives in school decision-making processes strengthens social accountability and builds

trust.

Participatory models have been shown to improve school performance and community satisfaction

in various contexts (UNESCO, 2021). Egypt’s education system would benefit from institutionalizing

mechanisms for stakeholder involvement at the school level.

Conclusion

This study has explored the state of accountability in the Egyptian education system, highlighting the

persistent gap between policy design and practical implementation. Despite comprehensive

frameworks aimed at ensuring quality and performance, accountability mechanisms in Egypt remain

largely symbolic, functioning as compliance exercises rather than drivers of meaningful educational

improvement.

Key Findings

The research identified several critical barriers undermining effective accountability:

• Centralization and Bureaucracy: Excessive top-down control restricts school-level

autonomy, preventing localized solutions and innovation.

• Inadequate Data Systems: Weak and outdated data infrastructures limit evidence-based

decision-making, reducing accountability to a formal reporting task.

• Teacher Resistance and Lack of Support: Evaluations are often perceived as punitive, with

little connection to professional development, leading to disengagement and mistrust.

• Limited Stakeholder Involvement: Parents, students, and communities are minimally

involved in school governance and accountability, missing opportunities for social oversight

and participatory improvement.

These findings align with global literature that underscores the challenges of accountability in

centralized education systems, where compliance overshadows collaboration and improvement (

(OECD, 2013); (UNESCO, 2021).

Recommendations

To enhance the effectiveness of accountability mechanisms in Egypt, a multi-faceted approach is

required:

1. Shift from Compliance to Developmental Accountability

Accountability should be reframed as a tool for supporting teachers and schools, fostering a

culture of reflection, feedback, and continuous improvement. This includes linking

evaluations with professional development opportunities.

2. Decentralization of Decision-Making

Empowering schools with greater autonomy to manage accountability processes tailored to

their specific contexts is essential. Decentralization would allow for more agile responses to

local challenges and foster ownership at the school level.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

77

3. Investing in Data Systems

Modern, integrated data systems are crucial for tracking performance, guiding interventions,

and ensuring transparency. Investment in School Management Information Systems (SMIS)

would enable real-time monitoring and evidence-based decision-making.

4. Promoting Inclusive Governance

Engaging parents, students, and community actors in accountability processes can strengthen

social accountability, enhance trust, and ensure that schools are responsive to the needs of

their stakeholders.

5. Addressing Regional Disparities

Differentiated strategies are needed to address the unique challenges faced by rural and

underserved schools. Equity-focused accountability models should be designed to ensure that

all schools, regardless of location, can participate meaningfully in quality assurance processes.

Limitations and Future Research

While this study provides valuable insights, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. The focus

was restricted to general education, excluding technical and higher education sectors. Additionally,

the sample size, while appropriate for qualitative research, limits the generalizability of findings.

Future research should consider:

• Longitudinal studies to assess the impact of participatory and developmental accountability

models in Egypt.

• Comparative research examining successful accountability practices in other developing

countries with similar governance structures.

• The role of technology in transforming educational accountability, especially in rural

contexts.

Final Reflection

Accountability, when designed and implemented effectively, can be a powerful lever for educational

quality and equity. However, in Egypt, systemic reforms are required to transform accountability

from a control mechanism into a catalyst for continuous improvement.

The journey towards meaningful accountability involves not only policy adjustments but also cultural

shifts. Moving from fear-driven compliance to shared responsibility requires building trust,

enhancing capacities, and fostering collaboration among all educational actors.

If Egypt embraces this transformation, accountability can evolve into a dynamic process that

empowers teachers, engages communities, and ultimately improves student learning outcomes.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

78

Referencias

Bowen , G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitave Research Method. Qualitave Research Journal, 9(2),

27–40. hps://doi.org/hps://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using themac analysis in psychology. Qualitave research in psychology, 3(2),

77-101. hps://doi.org/hps://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitave Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five

Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publicaons.

Denzin, N. (2012). Triangulaon 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.

hps://doi.org/hps://doi.org/10.1177/15586898124371

El-Amine, A. (2020). Educaon Reform in Egypt: Challenges and Opportunies. Middle East Instute.:

hps://www.mei.edu/publicaons/educaon-reform-egypt

Ibrahim Ramadan, F., Zaaba, Z., & Umemoto, K. (2011). Quality Assurance of Egypan Higher Educaon: A

Policy Transfer Perspecve. Literacy Informaon and Computer Educaon Journal , 2(1), 338-349.

hps://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2011.0047

MoE, M. (2018). Egypt Educaon Reform Strategy (Educaon 2.0). Cairo: MoE.

NAQAAE. (2021). Naonal Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditaon of Educaon. Annual Report

2021. Cairo: NAQAAE.

OECD. (2013). Synergies for Beer Learning: An Internaonal Perspecve on Evaluaon and Assessment.

Paris: OECD Publishing.

Paon, M. Q. (2015). Qualitave Research & Evaluaon Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publicaons.

UNESCO. (2021). Educaon Policy Review: Egypt. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

World Bank. (2018). Expectaons and Aspiraons: A New Framework for Educaon in the Middle East and

North Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.