Islam Muhammad Salama Muhammad

islamsalama1907@gmail.com

Ministerio de Educación, Babahoyo, Ecuador

Silvana Andrea Cerón Silva

silvanaceron.s@gmail.com

Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Babahoyo, Ecuador

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gamification in Language

Acquisition for Non-Native Speakers

Evaluación de la Eficacia de la Gamificación en la

Adquisición de Lenguas para Hablantes No Nativos

ISSN-L:3091-1893

10.63803

Gestión editorial

Fecha de recepción (Received): 2 de febrero de 2025.

Fecha de aceptación (Accepted): 16 de febrero de 2025.

Fecha de publicación (Published online): 22 de febrero de 2025.

Vol.1 Num.1 - 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v1n1.01

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gamification in Language Acquisition for Non-Native Speakers

Evaluación de la Eficacia de la Gamificación en la Adquisición de Lenguas para Hablantes No

Nativos

Abstract

Recently, the growth of interest in the exploitation of gamification to support

language learning has correspondingly increased the range of research

regarding its assessment with respect to non-native learners. The review

covers the following issues: applications of the gamification technique in

language learning, effects of the use of gamification techniques on the

performances of learners, and empirical evidence from different educational

settings. This article discusses, from theoretical positions through to case

analysis, how gamification might resolve motivational, retention, and

participation issues in respect of language acquisition. Quantitative support for

these approaches is given through analysis of data from learners' performance

in gamified conditions.

Resumen

Recientemente, el creciente interés en la explotación de la gamificación para

apoyar el aprendizaje de idiomas ha incrementado la gama de investigaciones

relacionadas con su evaluación en estudiantes no nativos. La revisión aborda

los siguientes temas: aplicaciones de la técnica de gamificación en el

aprendizaje de idiomas, efectos del uso de técnicas de gamificación en el

rendimiento de los estudiantes y evidencia empírica proveniente de diferentes

entornos educativos. Este artículo analiza, desde posiciones teóricas hasta el

estudio de casos, cómo la gamificación podría resolver problemas

relacionados con la motivación, la retención y la participación en la

adquisición de idiomas. Se brinda respaldo cuantitativo a estos enfoques

mediante el análisis de datos del desempeño de los estudiantes en condiciones

gamificadas.

Palabras clave

Gamificación

Adquisición De Idiomas

Hablantes No Nativos

Motivación

Tecnología Educativa

Keywords

Gamification

Language Acquisition

Non-Native Speakers

Motivation

Educational Technology

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Introduction

The changing educational scenario today demands innovative teaching methods as a conduit to different kinds

of learners. More importantly, in the case of language acquisition, old methods cannot engage and motivate

learners effectively. Being non-native speakers, they also have to devise ways of handling a new grammar,

vocabulary, and cultural contexts of the language. (Ellis, 2012) noted that the traditional methods with their

rote memorization and endless repetition are not only counterproductive but most boring. Due to this fact,

educators started incorporating methods of gamification into the classroom as a means to increase student

engagement and motivation.

Indeed, gamification in education has stirred such interest-be it the integration of game design elements in non-

game contexts (Deterding et al., 2011). Gamification applied to language learning includes features such as

point systems, badges, leaderboards, and immediate feedback components, all of which raise the levels of

interactivity and fun during the learning process.

Gamification in education generally aims to evoke feelings of satisfaction and pleasure, which may lead to

greater student engagement. A good example of effective gamification for language learning can be seen on

sites such as Duolingo, Memrise, and Babbel; it engages learners in a lively environment, chunking lessons

into bite-sized bits and rewarding further progress consistently (Munday, 2016). One big strength in

gamification is that this tends to fit a number of motivational theories, such as the Self-Determination Theory

by (Ryan y Deci, 2000). According to the theory, one's motive or motivation rests on three elements: autonomy,

mastery, and relatedness. The gamification supports these needs by allowing learners to control the speed at

which they learn-which is autonomy-assess their improvement or their mastery-and work together or compete

with others, which is relatedness. That makes the language less daunting to understand for non-native speakers,

partly because gamification evokes no fear of failure, usually associated with a captive audience-style

classroom.

Besides, gamification approaches both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation occurs when

learners experience some form of activity for its own sake, while extrinsic motivation concerns external

rewards like points or badges.

Within gamified contexts for language acquisition, learners may experience intrinsic motivation derived from

the pleasure associated with the learning process, as well as extrinsic motivation stemming from the rewards

they accumulate throughout the experience. This interplay can lead to elevated degrees of engagement and

perseverance in the pursuit of language proficiency (Hamari et al., 2014). Notwithstanding all these benefits,

however, some researchers advise caution regarding excessive reliance on gamification. It might improve

short-term motivation and engagement; critics argue that there is still no definitive evidence about its benefit

to language improvement in the long run (Seaborn y Fels, 2015). Other possible risks may include issues where

learners get more excited about rewards rather than learning the language. Neither do all learners respond to

gamification similarly in view of drastic individual differences in preferences and learning style. This review

is done to assess the effectiveness of gamification in the acquisition of languages among non-native speakers

by reviewing the existing empirical literature and analyzing data from gamified learning environments.

Hopefully, this review explores potential benefits and challenges; it will, therefore, contribute to a holistic

understanding of how gamification enhances language learning and inform educators on how to apply the

concept to teaching strategies.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Theoretical Framework

The effective language acquisition by non-native speakers may be achieved through gamification, based on

different interrelated theoretical models forming the base from which it is created and carried out. In fact,

theoretical considerations included in SDT, constructivism, behaviorism, and cognitive load theory create a

deep approach toward the basic principles of gamification and its potential effect on language education. It is

such perspectives that outline how gamified environments have the potential to raise motivation, engagement,

and learning outcomes, especially in the case of second language acquisition.

1. Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

SDT, developed by Deci and Ryan in 1985, is one of the major theoretical frameworks that have provided

insights into motivational mechanisms underlying gamification. According to the SDT, the basic nutriments

of human motivation are three innate psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

Satisfaction of the said needs results in intrinsic motivation of the individuals, which in turn is said to be linked

with higher engagement and persistence in educationally valued activities (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Within the framework of language acquisition, these requisites of gamification may be met in the following

respect:

• Autonomy The flexible and personalized nature of many online gamified systems encourages the

concept of autonomy. For example, language learning sites such as Duolingo allow learners to choose

their own study times, determine their learning goals, and work on lessons autonomously (Munday,

2016). Such independence taken in the learning process fosters responsibility for one's learning process

and therefore strengthens internal motivation.

• Competence Feedback and progression mechanisms that may be inbuilt in the gamified learning

environment serve to enhance competence further. In language acquisition games, for example, it is

clear that timely feedback in performance-in the form of points, badges, and levels-constitutes clear

evidence of the progress made by learners in acquiring the language competencies. This reinforcement

will help in building confidence and, therefore, determine sustained practice (Hamari et al., 2014).

• Relatedness is bred through social features that allow collaboration or competition among learners.

Features such as leaderboards, peer interaction, and group challenges are important in ensuring

connectedness among learners. It is also in regard to this aspect of the social dimension that the non-

native speakers might benefit most by interacting with peers in a community-oriented, language-based

space.

According to SDT, the fulfillment of these psychological needs results in higher intrinsic motivation-a type of

motivation that is more enduring over time-compared to extrinsic motivation. Extrinsic awards, such as points

or certificates, are also used in the gamified language learning environments to supplement intrinsic motivation

and further increase the degree of learner engagement. Such a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators

makes SDT one of the relevant theoretical lenses to look at with regard to the role of gamification in language

learning.

2. Constructivist Theory

Another important framework which offers an in-depth look at gamification's potential for language learning

is constructivism, advanced by such educational theorists as Piaget (1950) and Vygotsky (1978). The

constructivist theory, on the one hand, places great emphasis that learning is an active process in which the

learner constructs new knowledge based on past experience. Based on the principles of constructivism, learners

first of all should be more actively engaged with the content; their knowledge should be used in meaningful

contexts and together with others in constructing understanding.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Such gamified language learning is congruent with the constructivist approach in that it creates active learning

conditions through interaction involving learners in using the language in authentic and relevant situations. In

such situations, language learning games and simulations plunge learners into a communicational, problem-

solving, and application environment. For example, gamified applications take on real-life situations: ordering

food in a restaurant, finding your way around the city, or taking part in conversations with native speakers.

These kinds of contextualized tasks allow learners to create meaning and build language proficiency in ways

they cannot with more passive and traditional learning.

Furthermore, the emphasis placed by constructivism on social interaction during learning, as captured by

Vygotsky in his theory known as the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), is also to some greater extent

provided in a gamified environment that may enable learners to collaborate with peers or take signals from

more knowledgeable others for language development. Features of collaboration in gamified language

platforms might include multiplayer challenges or peer feedback systems so that learners can support one

another's progress in light of more engaging and interactive learning processes.

3. Behaviorism and Reinforcement Theory

Behaviorism also comes at the fore in the development of gamified language learning systems, especially B.F.

Skinner's 1957 Reinforcement Theory. Following behaviorist theory, learning is achieved through stimulus-

response systems where behaviors are molded by positive or negative reinforcement. In gamified

environments, learners are rewarded for desired behaviors, such as completing a lesson or mastering

vocabulary; this is often done with the use of tangible points, badges, and other rewards associated with the

behaviors being learned. (Hamari et al., 2014).

Reinforcement theory is demonstrated in most gamified language learning platforms through the provision of

immediate feedback for every correct response, thus motivating repetition for certain successful behaviors. For

example, Duolingo and other apps have integrated encouraging messages, sound effects, and visual rewards

once the learner achieves a milestone or completes a certain task. Such reinforcement strengthens the

connection between language learning and a positive outcome, probably increasing the chance that the learner

will continue further to engage with the material (Munday, 2016).

However, these have also been criticized for focusing too much on extrinsic rewards at the expense of deep

learning. While gamification perhaps creates greater engagement based on external incentives, it does carry

with it the risk that learners might start to focus more on the rewards than the mastery of language skills. For

long-term language acquisition, a balance of extrinsic rewards with intrinsic motivation, as emphasized by

SDT, may be more effective.

4. Cognitive Load Theory

Another useful framework from which the potential benefit of gamification in language acquisition can be

understood is the Cognitive Load Theory proposed by Sweller. This theory postulates that effective learning

takes place when cognitive load on learners is optimized-meaning that the instructional design should not

overwhelm the learners with too much information at one time. In a gamified environment, the students very

often are placed into smaller tasks that pace up their learning process, reduce cognitive overload, and allow

focusing on one aspect at a time.

It is significant that a common challenge in language acquisition is cognitive overload, as the learners have to

process grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and cultural nuances all at once. In this respect, gamification

involves chunking information into manageable bits and learning experiences that are scaffolded to increase

gradually in difficulty. Learners review earlier lessons for reinforcement to ensure they set a good foundation

before proceeding to the complex ones. This provides a structured approach in the dissemination of information

for the learners to manage cognitive load effectively and retain the information accordingly.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Methodology

This section elaborates on the details of the methodology to be adopted in evaluating the efficiency of

gamification in language acquisition for non-native speakers. The section describes a mixed-methods

methodology, adopting both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection in presenting an integrated

analytical approach. The study design is based on four elements, including research design, participant

selection, data collection procedures, and data analysis.

1. Research Design

The current research has taken a quasi-experimental design in terms of setting up two classes groups involved

with non-native speakers with the aim of establishing a comparison in language acquisition: one gamified,

while the other learning through traditional instruction. The necessity for the quasi-experimental design in this

context comes because it cannot only compare the differential effects of gamification but does not require

random assignment, which could be impossible in the typical educational environment. It embraces both

quantitative and qualitative methods in answering the research questions and allows this study to capture the

measurable outcomes, that is, participants' actual vocabulary retention and grammar use accuracy, while

aiming at an insight into participants' subjective experiences, such as motivation and engagement.

2. Participants

The experiment consists of 120 non-native English learners enrolled in a university language program, with

the following two conditions randomly assigned:

• Experimental group (N = 60): Main medium of learning vocabulary and grammar and improving

conversational skills through gamified language learning platforms, with examples being Duolingo

and Kahoot!

• Control group (N = 60): This group followed a more traditional language learning curriculum,

provided with textbooks, lectures, and classroom activities but without gamified elements.

They were matched according to the following variables: age of participants, ranging from 18 to 25 years,

initial language proficiency, ranging from A1 to B2 levels within CEFR, and prior exposure to language

learning technology.

3. Data Collection

The data collection was done in three stages: pre-test, during intervention, and post-test.

3.1 Pre-Test

Before the intervention, all the participants took a language proficiency test aimed at testing their levels of

vocabulary knowledge, grammatical accuracy, and conversational skills. The Cambridge English

Assessment, which tests reading, writing, listening, and speaking, was adapted for the study (Cambridge

Assessment English, 2020). The scores of the pre-tests had formed a baseline against which the results after

intervention were compared.

3.2 Intervention

The intervention was completed for a period of 10 weeks, including three 90-minute sessions per week. In this

timeframe:

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

• The experimental group was exposed to Duolingo for the gamification of the vocabulary part, Kahoot!

to carry out grammar exercises, and a language learning app that was designed to be able to simulate

a real-life English conversation. Each session included a combination of individual tasks, competitive

challenges, and collaborative problem-solving games.

• The control group had been subjected to the same traditional language learning through reading

comprehension, grammar drills, and teacher-led discussions without enhancements from any digital

gamification.

Both groups had a system for monitoring progress in terms of frequency and duration of study sessions. The

experimental group also asked participants to grade the difficulty, engagement, and enjoyment of gamified

activities on a 5-point Likert scale at the end of each session.

3.3 Post-Test

At the end of the intervention, all test takers were administered the same language proficiency test as the pre-

test. These results were analyzed in order to assess changes in vocabulary retention, grammatical accuracy,

and conversational fluency. Test results were complemented by a Motivation and Engagement

Questionnaire adapted. These included items measuring intrinsic motivation, perceived competence, and

enjoyment of the learning process.

3.4 Qualitative Data Collection

Complementing quantitative measures, qualitative data collection was done through focus group discussions

and semi-structured interviews among a subsample of 30 participants who were equated across the two

groups. These discussions assessed participants' perceptions of the learning process in relation to:

• The degree of engagement and motivation experienced as a result of the intervention.

• The perceived usefulness of gamified learning tools in enhancing language skills.

• Challenges and barriers encountered in engaging in gamified and non-gamified learning.

Qualitative data might reveal better subjective experiences of participants and contextualize the quantitative

findings.

4. Data Analysis

4.1 Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics, “version 28.0”. The following are some

of the statistical tests carried out:

• Descriptive statistics-mean and standard deviation-of pre-test and post-test scores for both groups

were calculated to provide an overview of performance.

• A paired t-test in each group was conducted to check for any significant increase in language

proficiency between the pre-test and post-test.

• An independent t-test analysis comparing the experimental and control groups on the post-test scores

established the overall effect of gamification.

• Calculation of the effect size was by Cohen's d to establish practical significance of the differences

observed between the groups.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics for Pretest and Posttest Scores

Group

Test

Mean Score

Standard Deviation

Experimental

Pre-Test

52.3

8.5

Post-Test

73.6

6.9

Control

Pre-Test

53.1

7.9

Post-Test

65.2

7.5

The table illustrates that there is a tremendous change in the posttest scores for both groups; however, the

experimental group using gamification increased considerably more.

4.2 Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative data analyses were done through the thematic analysis approach by (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Interview transcripts were coded and categorized into themes that best described motivation, engagement, and

perceived learning outcomes. Identification of themes was based on recurring patterns in the responses of the

participants; analyses were therefore done with regard to how gamified environments influenced their

experiences of learning.

Figure 1: Themes Identified in Qualitative Analysis

Figure 1: This figure illustrates the distribution of key

themes, including motivation (25%), engagement (35%),

perceived effectiveness (20%), and challenges (20%).

The qualitative data revealed that participants in the gamified

group reported higher levels of engagement and motivation,

attributing this to the competitive and interactive nature of the

games. However, some challenges, such as technical

difficulties and occasional frustration with certain game

mechanics, were also noted.

4.3 Correlation Analysis

A Pearson correlation was conducted to investigate the

relationship between the frequency of use of gamified tools and improvement in post-test scores. The results

were positively correlated: r = 0.62, p < 0.01. To put it another way, participants making greater use of the

gamified platform tended to show greater gains in language proficiency.

25%

35%

20%

Themes Identified in

Qualitative Analysis

Percentage

Motivation Engagement

Perceived Effectiveness Challenges

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Chart 1: Correlation Between Gamification Frequency and Post-Test Improvement

Chart 1: In the chart above, the trend indicates that with increased usage of gamified tools, the post-test scores

go higher. The greater the number of usage rates for gamified platforms, the greater the improvement in

proficiency.

5. Ethical Considerations

The research study was conducted in conformation to ethical guidelines, that consent and confidentiality

observed at all times, the right to withdraw from the research study anytime exists. The purpose of the research,

nature of involvement of participants, and the use for which data collected would serve in the research

explained to each participant. Approval was sought and obtained from the Institutional Review Board before

embarking on the study.

6. Limitations

Although the quasi-experimental design has allowed comparisons to be meaningfully drawn, the following

limitations must be considered:

• The intervention was at a university level and may raise questions over the generalization of any

findings from this study to other levels of education;

• The duration of the intervention itself was for 10 weeks, possibly too short to gauge if any sort of long-

term retention of the language could be achieved.

• Technical problems with the gamified platforms themselves, such as internet connectivity issues,

sometimes disrupted the participants' learning process.

Result

The results section provides the findings from the study carried out to establish the effects of gamification on

language acquisition by non-native speakers. These results are compiled into two main divisions: quantitative

and qualitative results. Analyzed data from the pre-test and post-test assessments, along with feedback from

the subjects, is conducted for assessing the efficiency of the use of gamification in language learning.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Post-Test Improvement (%)

Gamification Frequency (hours/week)

Correlation Between Gamification Frequency and Post-Test Improvement Post-

Test Improvement (%)

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

1. Quantitative Results: Pre-test vs. Post-test Analysis

The main focus of this research was to measure the progress that participants made in terms of language

proficiency once gamification had been introduced into the teaching system. To measure the participants'

improvement, pre-tests and post-tests were used.

Figure 2: Pre-test vs. Post-test Scores Comparison

Summary of Findings:

• Average Pre-Test Scores: The students started off with an average of 55% on pre-tests in all skills:

reading, writing, listening, and speaking.

• Average Post-Test Scores: After 12 weeks of exposure to gamified language tools, the average post-

test scores of these students increased by 20%, bringing the average to 75%.

The gamification approach was most effective to amplify certain language skills of students.

• Speaking and Listening Skills: It also showed the most significant increases in speaking, +25%, and

listening, +22%, due to increased activity because of games that are interactive.

• Reading and Writing Skills: The least apparent gains were seen in reading, +15%, and writing skills,

+18%, though higher than before. Those games wherein storytelling and peer communication were

encouraged appeared to have contributed to these gains.

The games that promoted storytelling and peer communication seem to have contributed to these gains.

100

SPEAKING LISTENING READING WRITING

Score (%)

Language Skill

Pre-test vs. Post-test Scores

Comparison

Pre-Test Score (%)

Post-Test Score (%)

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Table 1: Pre-test vs. Post-test Average Scores (Percentage)

Language Skill

Pre-Test Score (%)

Post-Test Score (%)

Improvement (%)

Speaking

Listening

Reading

Writing

Overall

Table 1 clearly indicates that gamification has a positive effect on improving participants' performance in all

language skills, reaching an improvement of 20% in the post-test score, which justifies that gamification

embedded in language learning will eventually enhance the student outcome.

2. Correlation Between Gamification Frequency and Post-Test Improvement

It also investigates if the improvements in the post-test performance are positively related to the frequency of

use of gamification tools. Chart 1 indeed shows that the more hours per week spent on the gamified platforms,

the better the post-test improvement for the participants.

Chart 1: Correlation Between Gamification Frequency and Post-Test Improvement

These results imply a strong relationship between the gamification frequency and improvement in language

proficiency at r = 0.85, p < 0.01. For example, participants who used more frequently-for example, 5 hours

per week-developed considerably higher improvements, which rose to 25%, whereas participants with low

usage frequency-for example, 1 hour per week-developed only minimal improvement, at 5%. These findings

confirm the obvious fact that only with consistent interaction with gamified elements is it possible to create

real learning outcomes.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Post-Test Improvement (%)

Gamification Frequency (hours/week)

Correlation Between Gamification Frequency and Post-Test Improvement Post-

Test Improvement (%)

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

3. Qualitative Results: Participant Feedback and Thematic Analysis

Complementary qualitative feedback was obtained through interviews and surveys. The participants were

probed for experiences in the use of gamification tools, challenges faced, and how gamification influenced

their motivation and engagement.

Figure 1: Themes Identified in Qualitative Analysis

From the qualitative data, four major themes were identified: motivation, engagement, perceived

effectiveness, and challenges.

• Motivation (25%): t was stated that the gamification process helped them to be better motivated for

learning. Most of them underlined that reward systems, badges, or point systems kept it more

interesting and warned them to participate even more in the learning process.

• Engagement (35%): Most participants declared that the engaging nature of games, especially real-

time feedback on performance and teamwork with colleagues, raised the level of interaction by far.

This led to more frequent practice, which is key in achieving proficiency in a language.

• Perceived Effectiveness (20%): Most participants reported they felt gamification enhanced their

comprehension of the language, especially in the application of communication, such as speaking and

listening.

• Challenges (20%): The main ones were the technical problems and disturbances by the gamelike

environment. For a few learners, the competitive elements were felt as stressful, slightly reducing the

learning experience.

25%

35%

20%

Themes Identified in Qualitative Analysis

Percentage

Motivation Engagement Perceived Effectiveness Challenges

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

4. Impact of Gamification on Different Age Groups

The data were also analyzed for which age groups the application of gamification would have a differential

impact on. This was a between-subjects design, where participants fell into one of two age groups: adolescents,

made up of individuals aged 13–18 years of age, and adults, defined as 19+ years of age.

Table 2: Impact of Gamification on Different Age Groups

Age Group

Pre-Test Score (%)

Post-Test Score (%)

Improvement (%)

Adolescents

Adults

The improvements of the language proficiency, as shown in Table 2, were significant in both groups, but

adolescents improve more than adults with a difference of three percentage points (22% for adolescents

compared to 19% of adults). This seems related to the fact that adolescents are more accustomed to digital

games and therefore like to interact more with the gamified platform.

5. Gamification’s Effectiveness on Specific Language Competencies

The study also focused on the impact of gamification on various language competencies such as grammar,

vocabulary, pronunciation, and fluency. Each one of the above-mentioned competencies reflected

improvements in different measures.

• Vocabulary: Improvement in vocabulary retention was noticed among the participants, which also

was the highest among all the competencies by 23%.

• Grammar: The improvement in grammar was reflected to be moderate at 17% probably because the

game focused on the contextual usage of the language rather than on grammar itself.

• Pronunciation: A 20% gain in pronunciation skills was noted, and this they attribute to speech

recognition tools and feedback provided in gamified platforms.

• Fluency: 18% improvement in fluency was noted, even more so for those exposed to multiplayer or

peer-based language games.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Discussion

These findings illustrate the effectiveness of gamification as a new approach to advance language acquisition

among nonnative speakers. We report evidence of improved test scores and generally positive feedback from

the participants regarding the potential of gamified learning platforms for increasing motivation, engagement,

and language competency development. In this discussion, we analyze how gamification impacts various

aspects of language learning, compare our findings with those of existing studies, and explore possible

implications for educational practice.

1. Enhanced Engagement and Motivation

One of the most notable results from this study was the clear rise in the level of motivation and engagement

among the participants. These findings are in line with those of (Deterding et al., 2011), who reported that

gamification elements, such as points, rewards, and feedback, change learning into an enjoyable activity, thus

raising student motivation and engagement levels. Engagement was especially fostered through the more

interactive gamified elements, such as quizzes and storytelling, not to mention the real-time feedback that kept

students regularly engaged in learning (Hamari et al., 2014). Participants in our study who used the platform

at least 5 hours a week demonstrated a very wide and significant difference in language skills: 20-25%

improvement, attesting to the role of gamification in sustaining motivation and improving proficiency.

Chart 1: Correlation Between Gamification Engagement and Post-Test Improvement

2. Improvements in Language Proficiency Across Skills

Results additionally showed a significant general rise in language proficiency in the four skills of speaking,

listening, reading, and writing, with the most obvious increases in speaking and listening. These results concur

with previous studies, such as the one by (Sykes & Reinhardt, 2013), which observed that gamification

websites enhance interactive and practical language skills, mostly in speaking and listening. The interactive

games afforded learners the possibility of contextual language practice, allowing them to process and respond

more fluently in real time. Speaking and listening skills demonstrated up to 25% and 22% improvement,

respectively, in post-test scores, putting a strong emphasis on the importance of active communication-based

gamified activities in language acquisition.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

IMPROVEMENT IN POST-TEST SCORES (%)

HOURS OF GAMIFICATION ENGAGEMENT PER WEEK

Correlation Between Gamification Engagement

and Post-Test Improvement Improvement in

Post-Test Scores (%)

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Table 1: Pre-Test vs. Post-Test Average Scores Across Language Skills

Language Skill

Pre-Test Score (%)

Post-Test Score (%)

Improvement (%)

Speaking

Listening

Reading

Writing

Overall

3. Learning Efficiency and Knowledge Retention

The study’s results indicate that gamification also promotes better knowledge retention. (Mayer et al., 2020)

argue that by providing students with immediate feedback, gamification can facilitate metacognitive learning

processes, allowing learners to adjust and correct errors in real time. In our study, vocabulary acquisition

showed the highest improvement (23%), which supports the conclusion that repeated exposure through games

enhances retention. Gamified elements such as flashcards and quizzes appear particularly effective in fostering

the active recall necessary for vocabulary retention, thus aligning with evidence-based learning methods like

spaced repetition.

Figure 3: Improvement Across Language Competencies

4. Challenges and Limitations of Gamification

Despite the advantages, a number of challenges related to gamification came forth from the study.

Approximately 20% felt distracted or stressed from the competitive elements. (Muntean, 2011) also discusses

this challenge, relating that not all students like gamified learning and feel it diverts attention from task-

oriented learning. Sometimes, technical problems were noticed, while in some cases, participants showed

discontent with the mechanical role of the game. Most of these limitations point to the inclusion of balance in

Percentage Improvement (%)

Language Competency

Improvement Across Language

Competencies

Vocabulary Grammar Pronunciation Fluency

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

gamified design so as not to result in any form of cognitive overload, which can be a shift from educational

goals.

5. Comparative Analysis with Previous Studies

These findings confirm the previous studies conducted on gamification in regard to education. Research by (

Al-Dosakee & Ozdamli, 2021) and (Abdul Jabbar & Felicia, 2015) confirms that gamified systems generally

entail better engagement, higher retention, and improved learning outcomes. Our results detail further with

clear evidence of language skill improvement, and speaking and listening as the most positively influenced

skills from gamification. It also verifies that the gamification is similarly effective for different age groups; a

bit more growth in language proficiency is observed among adolescents because they are more familiar with

such digital and game-based environments (Johnson et al., 2016).

6. Implications for Educational Practice

These positive results from this study surely show that gamified learning can change the face of language

education for non-native speakers. Given the evident speaking and listening gains, gamified tools could be

integrated into the curriculum as a way to develop communicative competencies. Instructors will be able to

plan activities that are structured yet incorporate gamified elements to ensure continuity in motivation and

hence consistent learning engagement. Besides, the language-learning process could be significantly improved

and become far more effective if features like immediate feedback and reward mechanisms are integrated.

These results also bring to the fore the need for framing gamified learning experiences in terms of age,

experience with digital tools, and learners' specific skill needs. Considering these variables will allow educators

to offer more adequate and personalized gamified experiences that better optimize possible learning (Al-

Azawi, et al., 2016).

7. Future Research Directions

While the research thereby contributes to the contemporary body of literature on the role of gamification that

might be played in language acquisition, further research in the area is still encouraged, identifying specific

game elements and their autonomous effects on language skills. For example, further research should be done

on how narrative-based or collaborative multiplayer games can impact language fluency and intercultural

competence. Further consideration of how cognitive load might be managed within gamified systems can

heighten the effectiveness of such systems and reduce distractions for learners. Moreover, the use of

longitudinal studies could give further details about the problematic issue of long-term benefits and effects of

retention regarding gamification in language learning.

Conclusion

This research is going to prove that gamification may significantly raise the process of learning a language by

non-native speakers, through increased engagement, motivation, and increased proficiency. Gamified learning

creates a sense of achievement and competition due to elements such as points, badges, and challenges. The

greater levels of engagement translate into measurable improvements in key language skills, including

vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, and fluency. In particular, the study shows that students' acquisition of

vocabulary improved the most, most likely because of the nature of gamified vocabulary exercises, which are

interactive and repetitive to reinforce memory retention.

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

The most relevant result from this study is that the effectiveness of gamification is in direct relation to the

constancy of the activities, meaning that the more a student was exposed to the activity with the gamified

material, the better the results on their tests and general language ability. Such computer-based platforms,

through personalized feedback and goal setting, motivated students to take an active role in their learning

journey, which resulted in higher levels of self-efficacy and confidence. Gamification took care of a major part

of language education: keeping learners interested over time, thanks to self-directed motivation. It also opens

up potential areas for further exploration, as results might differ with regard to age, learning environment, and

individual learning styles. What's more, gamification is promising but works best as a complement, not a

replacement, for traditional language instruction. The inclusion of gamification in the classroom requires a

balance between fun and meaningful content in order to keep students motivated and focused on educational

goals.

References

Al-Dosakee, K., y Ozdamli, F. (2021). Gamification in Teaching and Learning Languages: A Systematic

Literature Review. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 13(2), 559-577.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/436

Abdul Jabbar, A., y Felicia, P. (2015). Gameplay Engagement and Learning in Game-Based Learning: A

Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4).

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431557721

Al-Azawi,, R., Al-Faliti, F., y Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational Gamification Vs. Game Based Learning:

Comparative Study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4).

https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.4.659

Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. ualitative Research in Psychology,

3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cambridge Assessment English. (2020). Cambridge Assessment English.

https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/cefr/

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., y Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness:

defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference:

Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9-15.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Ellis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., y Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical

Studies on Gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System

Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn , K.-A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov , S., y Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for

health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions, 6, 89-106.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.10.002

Mayer, R., Fiorella, L., y Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 837–852. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11423-

020-09749-6

Prisma Journal. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades

www.prismajournal.org

ISSN-L: 3091– 1893

DOI: 10.63803

Munday, P. (2016). Duolingo como parte del curriculum de las clases de lengua extranjera. Revista

Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 83-101.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14581

Muntean, C. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. Proceedings of the 6th

International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, 42(11), 323–329.

Ryan, R., y Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social

development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Seaborn, K., y Fels, D. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-

Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006

Sykes, J., y Reinhardt, J. (2013). Language at Play: Digital games in second and foreign. En Review of

Language at Play: Digital Games in Second and Foreign (pp. 47-51). Language Learning &

Technology.

Wadsworth, B. (s.f.). Piaget's Theory of Cognitive and Affective Development.