Implementation of good agricultural and environmental practices among students of the Amazon State University at CEIPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v1n4.30Keywords:
Sustainable Development, Biodiversity, Good Agricultural Practices, Environmental EducationAbstract
This study aimed to design a plan for the implementation of Good Agricultural and Environmental Practices (GAEP) at the CEIPA, based on a comprehensive diagnostic assessment of current conditions. A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining surveys of 320 students, interviews with technical staff, and direct observation of agricultural and environmental practices. The findings revealed a significant gap between theoretical knowledge (4.12/5.00) and practical application (3.25/5.00), mainly attributed to inadequate infrastructure (78%) and limited curricular integration (70%). Additionally, the use of phytosanitary products such as glyphosate and practices like controlled burning were observed. Consequently, the study concludes that the effective implementation of GAEP requires a comprehensive model that integrates regulatory, infrastructural, curricular, and research components, in order to position CEIPA as a benchmark for agricultural sustainability in Ecuador’s Amazon region.
Downloads
References
Altieri, M., & Nicholls, C. (2020). Agroecología: Teoría y práctica para una agricultura sustentable. Madrid: Editorial Mundi-Prensa.
Cerda, R., Deheuvels, O., & Somarriba, E. (2022). Ecosystem services in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(1), 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00748-2
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed. ed.). London: SAGE.
Gaviria, S., Químico, M., Suelo, D., Fierro Morales, J., Geotecnia, E., Sorzano López, C., & Guió Blanco, C. (2020). Evaluación independiente del plan de manejo ambiental modificado para el programa de erradicación de cultivos ilícitos por aspersión aérea (PECIG). Mamacoca.org. http://www.mamacoca.org/docs_de_base/Fumigas/AP_883-2020/16-%20Informe-Geoambiental-Glifosato_vFinal.pdf#:~:text=contra%20el%20C%C3%A1ncer%20de%20la%20OMS%20lo,evidencia%20los%20posibles%20efectos%20para%20la%20salud.
Gliessman, S. (2022). Agroecology: Leading the transformation to a just and sustainable food system (4th ed. ed.). Boca Ratón, FL: CRC Press.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Mendoza, C., & Torres, C. (2022). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta (7.ª ed. ed.). Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. En The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed. ed., págs. 559-603). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kronenberg, J. (2024). The role of universities in regional sustainability transitions: A case study from the Amazon. Sustainability Science, 19(2), 543-559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01432-y
Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A., Kronlid, D., & McGarry, D. (2019). Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 73-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
Morales, J., Soto, G., & Barrera, J. (2021). Circular economy in experimental farms: A review of best practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125750
Pretty, J. (2018). Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science, 362(6417), eaav0294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0294
Reed, M. (2023). The role of social learning in building sustainability. Ecology and Society, 28(1), 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13896-280115
Roling, N. (2021). Facilitating sustainable agriculture: Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sumberg, J., Andersson, J., & Giller, K. (2023). A new perspective on agricultural research and development. Global Food Security, 36, 100667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100667
Universidad Estatal Amazónica. (2025). Centro experimental de investigación y producción amazónica. https://www.uea.edu.ec/web/v2/?page_id=23073
Vera Santi, L., Villarroel Córdova, F., Macias Bazurto, L., Vera Santi, D., & Leones-Zambrano, W. (2024). Implementación de un Sistema de Información Geográfica, SIG, en el Centro Experimental de Investigación y Producción Amazónica-Ceipa de la Universidad Estatal Amazónica. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(4), 3138-3153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.12556
World Wildlife Fund. (2025). Biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of two priority landscapes in the Ecuadorian Amazon region. https://www.worldwildlife.org/projects/biodiversity-conservation-and-sustainable-management-of-two-priority-landscapes-in-the-ecuadorian-amazon-region
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 © The authors. Published by Prisma Journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ecuador
