Scientific Literacy and Argumentative Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Approach in Experimental Sciences and Language in the General Unified Baccalaureate

Authors

  • Steven Lenin Cedeño Anchundia Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador image/svg+xml Author
  • Cindy Mabel Macías Moreira Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador image/svg+xml Author
  • Carlos Antonio Mendoza Vera Unidad Educativa la SALLE Author
  • Erika Monserrate Mendoza Loor Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador image/svg+xml Author
  • Diego Armando Bravo Vera Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v2n2.31

Keywords:

Scientific Literacy, Argumentation, Interdisciplinarity, Science Education, Language learning

Abstract

Scientific literacy is a fundamental competence in contemporary education, as it enables students to interpret scientific information, analyze evidence, and make informed decisions in everyday contexts. In the framework of the General Unified Baccalaureate, this competence is closely connected to the development of argumentative discourse, which plays a key role in the construction and communication of knowledge. This study examines the relationship between scientific literacy and argumentation from an interdisciplinary perspective that integrates experimental sciences and language education. Through a qualitative and documentary approach, relevant literature was analyzed to identify the benefits of incorporating argumentative practices into science teaching. The findings suggest that students who engage in structured argumentation activities improve their critical thinking, reasoning skills, and ability to express scientific ideas coherently. Furthermore, the integration of language and science fosters deeper conceptual understanding and promotes active participation in academic and social contexts, contributing to a more comprehensive and meaningful learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aikenhead. (2022). Scientific literacy and social justice. . Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(2), 1–15.

Andrade. (2024). Transformación educativa y pensamiento crítico en el siglo XXI. Revista Educare, 28(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016042608621

Chen, & Xiao. (2022). The role of language in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 44(5), 1–18.

Duschl, & Osborne. (2022). Supporting scientific argumentation. . Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 1–30.

Erduran, & Kaya. (2023). Argumentation in science education: Research perspectives. Science & Education., 32(2), 1–15.

Ford, & Forman. (2021). Redefining disciplinary learning. . Review of Research in Education., 45(1), 1–32.

García, & Paños. (2022). Alfabetización científica y enfoque CTSA en la educación secundaria. Ápice, 6(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2022.6.2.9046

Holbrook, & Rannikmäe. (2022). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 44(3), 1–14.

Montero, & Baloith. (2024). Alfabetización mediática y pensamiento crítico. Horizonte Científico, 14(2), 88–102.

Mujica-Sequera. (2021). Alfabetización científica: Herramienta indispensable en la era digital. . Revista Docentes 2.0, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.181

Müller, & Tippett. (2022). Argumentation in science education. . Research in Science Education, 52(4), 1–20.

OECD. (2023). Paris: OECD Publishing. PISA 2022 results: Volume I.

Osborne. (2021). Teaching scientific argumentation. . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 1–10.

Pérez-Rodríguez, & Baquero-Mendieta. (2025). Alfabetización científica en la educación científica y la didáctica de las ciencias: Tendencias y brechas. . Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 22(2). .

Sampson, & Clark. (2021). Argumentation in science education. . Science Education, 105(4), 1–20.

Sjöström, & Eilks. (2022). Reconsidering scientific literacy. . Science & Education, 31(4), 1–18.

Soria et al. (2024). Gamification tools for speaking learning improvement in English students B1 level. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(4), 1857–1867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i4.2379

Tang. (2023). Language and science education. Research in Science Education, 53(2), 1–15.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. . Paris: UNESCO.

Yabar, & Carcausto. (2023). Comprensión y alfabetización científica en la escuela: Revisión sistemática. . Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 7(31), 2724–2736. . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes

Published

2026-06-14

Issue

Section

Education and Pedagogy

How to Cite

Cedeño Anchundia, S. L., Macías Moreira, C. M., Mendoza Vera, C. A., Mendoza Loor, E. M., & Bravo Vera, D. A. (2026). Scientific Literacy and Argumentative Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Approach in Experimental Sciences and Language in the General Unified Baccalaureate. Prisma Journal, 2(2), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.63803/prisma.v2n2.31

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)